Good day my good friend.

Its September. So naturally, summer has decided to make an appearance in the UK after taking a break for most of July and August. The nation eagerly awaits the customary speed restrictions on the trains, and everyone heading to the coast on Saturday. Thankfully, with no rail strikes to disrupt everyone. Enjoy the weather, folks!

If the recent announcement by the Prime Minister still has you hot under the collar, we are talking ‘changing the narrative’ on sustainable transport at Mobility Camp on 26th September 2023 in Birmingham. It would be great to see you there. Get your tickets now.

If you like this newsletter, please share it with someone else who you think will love it. I will love you forever if you do. ☺️

James

🎫 Integrated ticketing? Lol

Last week, I took my car to its annual MOT and service. The only mechanic who could fit us in at rather short notice was in Bedford. By good fortune, Flitwick has two bus services running hourly to and from Bedford, which just so happen to run from the end of my road, and drop off and pick up outside the mechanic. All good.

Then you remember that the UK has a deregulated bus system. This makes joint ticketing hard to do, as well as, rather than being logical and having buses run every half an hour, the two services departing within 15 minutes of one another. Then, as I found out on the day, only one of the bus operators is part of the UK Government’s £2 maximum single fare scheme, as under deregulation its entirely voluntary.

This was a fact that I only found out after I boarded the bus and asked for a single ticket. Whereas it cost £2 to go and pick my car up in the evening, it cost £5.50 to travel home after picking it up in the morning.

Things like this are a small barrier in the wider context of barriers to bus use. But it plays into a wider view of buses being an unnecessary pain. Why should I have to check what operators run a discount scheme ahead of boarding? Why can I only use this bus and not that one? Why aren’t the buses every half an hour? These are questions that us transport professionals perfectly understand the answers to – the law, route timings etc. But they make no sense in terms of a usable system.

When buses were deregulated, the intention behind it was that on-street competition would improve standards or services where they are provided. And to be fair to the operators, the buses are very nice indeed and in some cases operators do run excellent services. The problem, however, is that to compete with the private car, public transport needs to operate as a connected system. The only way that works under a private ownership model is through close co-operation (which is often seen as collusion, and not in ‘the consumer interest’ as it means it is harder for new entrants to enter the market), or through a monopoly (definitely not seen as in the consumer interest).

I don’t think for one second that bus franchising or public ownership – effectively illegal outside of existing municipal bus companies in the UK thanks to the Bus Service Act 2017, by the way – will solve all problems with buses in the UK outside of London. Far from it. But it holds the potential to more easily overcome pointless barriers to use such as this.

From the end of this month, Manchester will take the first steps in delivering bus franchising for real. Personally, I wish them every success. As more people on buses, and less pointless barriers to using buses, is dearly needed.

To be fair, though. The buses themselves were quite nice.

Trending

Discover more from Mobility Matters

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading